Stephen Bowes CCIE SP Lab Blog

CCIE Service Provider Study Plan

Its official – Cisco have shot themselves in the CCIE foot, but…

Well we all drew breath when the v3 of the Service Provider Lab Exam was announced, the hardware list was incredibly expensive, no appetite amongst either candidates or vendors and this has been borne out nearly two months in.

1. There are no vendor labs – Cisco have seen this and placed a Sample Lab together on the Cisco Learning Network -> https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/certifications/ccie_service_provider?view=all

Note the lack of V3 discussion on the forums.

2. There are no rack rentals – only Gigavelocity are looking to potentially put a rack together depending on feedback from potential customers -> http://www.gigavelocity.com/blog/gigavelocity/gigavelocity-news/ccie-service-provider-v30-sample-lab/

3. No passes from INE or IPExpert – I have reviewed their Hall of Fames – Highest SP Number I have seen is 28471 and that was for V2.

4. The number of CCIE’s is dwindling anyhow – some good research done by Morton & Reese here -> http://bradreese.com/blog/5-24-2011.htm

5. To finish on two positive notes for potential candidates – here is a solid breakdown of the sections of the V3 Lab from a recent candidate and combined with the Sample Lab provided in Point 1 above may assist those still brave enough to dive back in -> http://ieoc.com/forums/t/15652.aspx

&

Our friend Antonio Soares has updated some Dynamips files & topologies for candidates here -> http://www.ccie18473.net/dynamips5/dynamips5.htm

 

HTH, Regards

Steve.

 

Advertisement

June 3, 2011 - Posted by | SP General |

2 Comments »

  1. The new lab is tough, but I really think people are making IOS-XR to be a bigger deal than it is. I can’t disagree with Cisco that this is the gear and the technology (e.g. VPLS, CSC, L3VPN, L2VPN, etc.) that SPs are going to be using moving forward. I’m also very pleased to see IPv6 alongside IPv4 on the new exam.

    Bradford Chatterjee
    CCIE 25267 R&S/SP

    Comment by Bradford Chatterjee | June 13, 2011 | Reply

  2. This is true, the equipment inducted are really expensive and no simulator support available too. Do you see any hope in near future so that CCIEQ like us go on and take the exam ?/

    Comment by AmitS | November 2, 2011 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.